When “Jones” is the first word in your brand name, shouldn’t you know how to conjugate the word properly?
That seems not to be the case with Jones New York, the namesake brand of a Fortune 500 retail conglomerate.
Screen shot from the Jones New York website.*
The same image and headline appear in a two-page ad in the September issue of Vogue (pages 190-191). Lavish styling, pricey photography, expensive ad buy. Too bad a few dollars weren’t left over to pay a proofreader.
Here’s the thing: The idiom is “Keeping up with the Joneses.”** Joneses is the plural of Jones, and it follows the rule about regular plural formation: If a word ends in a pronounced S—as opposed to the silent S of some French names like “Dumas”—add -es.
Not an apostrophe.
So maybe this apostrophized name is a possessive? According to some usage guides (notably the Associated Press Stylebook), words that end an S become possessives with the addition of an apostrophe. According to others (notably the Chicago Manual of Style), they need an apostrophe and an S: Kansas’s, Dickens’s, Morris’s.
But whichever guide you follow, a possessive noun has to possess something. We might say, for example, that we’re keeping up with the Joneses' circus skills. In the ad, however, nothing is being possessed.
Enough? Enough. After all, I still have 770 pages of the Vogue September issue to plow through. Who knows how many usage goofs lie ahead?
___
* The dress is $399, comes in sizes 2, 4, and 6 only, and won’t ship until September 14—and then it’s a final sale (no refunds or exchanges).
** According to the biographer of the novelist Edith Wharton, “keeping up with the Joneses” was coined in reference to Wharton’s very wealthy aunt, Elizabeth Schermerhorn Jones.
I actually cringed when I saw that. It could be worse, though: I've seen "Jone's" before.
Posted by: Jonathon | August 22, 2012 at 09:16 AM
In traditional grammatical terminology, verbs are conjugated; nouns and adjectives are declined.
Posted by: Q. Pheevr | August 22, 2012 at 09:45 AM
Shouldn't it be "the Joneses’circus skills" anyway?
Posted by: Jenne | August 22, 2012 at 03:29 PM
Jenne: Aarrggh -- of course it should! I've fixed it.
Posted by: Nancy Friedman | August 22, 2012 at 03:35 PM
Inexcusable! I noticed Pheevr's quibble too -- but how many readers would read "decline" properly in your sentence?
Posted by: Diana Landau | August 23, 2012 at 09:33 AM
I saw the apostrophe, but it still made me think of a drug habit. Considering those sizes, a jones might be needed for a good fit.
Posted by: MaryL | August 23, 2012 at 12:01 PM
I'll just chime in here -- late -- to note that "conjugate" also struck me. Way too many years spent leafing through "501 Spanish Verbs," I suppose. :-)
Posted by: mike | August 28, 2012 at 09:23 PM
Augh! I saw this same mistake in another JNY ad in a magazine the other day and couldn't believe it. It might be judgey of me, but when I see such glaring errors in print I lose respect for the brand.
Posted by: janelle | September 20, 2012 at 07:36 AM