« On the Visual Thesaurus: The Power of Ambiguity | Main | Big Companies, Bad Names »

March 21, 2012


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I love this (for obvious reasons)! I was also delighted to follow your links to your previous posts on naming -- nominology, as I've named it. It sounds like we've had a lot of similar thoughts about that. Here's an article I wrote about criteria for good names: http://messymatters.com/nominology

Thanks, @bmndr! Actually, there's already a name for the study of names: onomastics.

"Verbability"--one of your criteria--may be the holy grail for companies, but it's legally undesirable. For trademark purposes, a brand name should always be used as an adjective and only an adjective. Of course, if your *customers* want to verb your name, let them at it -- but the owner of a trademark should beware diluting the mark by using it as a verb. I wrote about brand-name verbing in 2009: http://bit.ly/3oofjy

I'm impressed that you know the term "onomastics"! I was set straight on that as soon as that article was posted, though I still like "nominology".

Good point about verbability but I'm going to file that under "problems to fantasize about". :)

The comments to this entry are closed.


  • Pinterest
    Follow Me on Pinterest
My Photo

My Web Site

Top 25 Language Language Professional Blogs 2014
Top 25 Language Professionals Blogs 2012
Top 25 Language Professionals Blogs 2011
Top 10 Language Professionals Blogs 2010
Top 100 Language Blogs 2009

Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz

Bookmark and Share


Top 25 Language Language Professional Blogs 2014