If there’s a less appealing brand name for a line of wood stains, I haven’t heard of it.
Snapped at Mark’s Paint Mart, Oakland.
On the bright side, at least it’s not the name of a fast-food chain. Or a hospital.
___
Sikkens is a subsidiary of the Dutch paint and coatings company AkzoNobel. Sikkens may be a dandy name in Dutch, but it hasn’t fared well on the Atlantic crossing.
Imagine the possibilities of their colour swatches: 'evening vomit', 'nauseous splurge', 'primrose puke'...
Posted by: Stan | July 30, 2010 at 09:44 AM
My guess: It's somebody's last name, they grew up with it, they love seeing it on their company's products, and they are blind to its implication.
Posted by: Bob Cumbow | July 30, 2010 at 02:10 PM
Okay, I just saw this within the last two days and thought "THERE'S one for the blog" - you beat me to it! And great minds think alike. I agree with Bob that it's most likely a surname. But still, imagine the possibilities: I like Sikkens. I recommend Sikkens. My friend used Sikkens. Not good!
Posted by: Jessica | July 30, 2010 at 03:20 PM
You lot are very literal.
This is a quality paint that has been around in Europe since 1792 [ http://www.sikkens.co.uk/en/About/History/ ]. I've known it all my life so the connection with vomit has never even occurred to me.
One wouldn't want to re-brand and lose that name in a hurry -- history like that takes a long time to build.
Posted by: John Russell | August 02, 2010 at 07:08 AM
@John Russell: Here in the U.S. we don't have the benefit of two centuries of brand familiarity; as far as I can tell, Sikkens was neither manufactured nor distributed in North America before the 1970s. The brand name had no positive associations here, only negative or unintentionally humorous ones.
Before entering a new market, a global company often does linguistic and cultural research to determine whether a name has undesirable associations. As a result, some global brands choose new names for new markets. Sikkens could have chosen to follow this path, but apparently the company (or its parent, the Swedish conglomerate AkzoNobel) decided that it wasn't worth the effort.
Posted by: Nancy Friedman | August 02, 2010 at 10:16 AM