My latest post for Strong Language, the sweary blog about swearing, is about two sweary neologisms: enshittify and enshittification. Both were coined within the last year by journalist and author Cory Doctorow, who uses them to describe the current state of certain large internet platforms and e-commerce sites.
Read more about the history and morphology of enshittify and enshittification.
| |
|
How are the 1,500-pound gorillas of commerce doing these days? Let’s rattle some Facebook and Amazon cages and find out!
*
Continue reading "In the news: Metamates and Amazonification" »
| |
|
Ten years ago, when social media and blogging were still new and a rational person was in the White House, I did something ambitious and presumptuous: I published a list of the Brands of the Decade.*
And now it’s time to do it again.
To qualify for my highly subjective top-12 list, a brand had to meet these guidelines:
Because I’m a name developer, I gave a little extra weight to brands with interesting or influential names.
A message to sticklers: Yes, I know that actually a decade begins in a year ending in 1, not 0. SORRY.
In alphabetical order, then:
| |
|
In Advertising Land, parts of speech move freely across borders. Nouns become verbs (“Prepare to Pumpkin,” “Let’s Movie”); adjectives become nouns (“Welcome to Possible,” “The Power of True”). This functional shift, or anthimeria, happens in regular English, too – share and contact were nouns long before they were verbs – but it’s downright rampant in ad copy, as these recent sightings demonstrate.
| |
|
Sad Internet: “A place full of unwatched videos, unliked photographs, unheard music, tweets that no one cared about, and crowdfunding projects that nobody backed.” – Rob Walker.
In an article for Yahoo! Tech published last week, Rob Walker takes a mournful look at websites that fit neither of the Internet’s dominant tropes: Happy (“delightful and hilarious memes and GIFs and videos made by GoPro-wearing puppies”) and Angry (“nasty troll attacks, flame wars, and outrage galore”). “Some manifestations of the Sad Internet,” Walker writes, “make a mockery of the pervasive cliché of the magical technology that connects us all, builds community, and generally permits the ‘crowd’ to find and reward the wonderful.”
Among those manifestations (with my naming notes):
Forgotify: Walker writes that this site “plumbs Spotify’s unheard depths to present you with a random m selection from the zero-listen archives.” The -ify name, overplayed as it is, seems perfectly ironic here. And I appreciate the rhyme with Spotify.
No Likes Yet: “All the photos on Instagram with no likes yet.” I agree with Walker about the agreeable “note of optimism, or at least yearning” in that Yet. But the name suffers a little for not riffing more directly on Instagram. (Instagrump? Un-stagram? Disinstergram?)
Sad Tweets: “Connect the application to your Twitter account, and it presents you with a lowlights reel of your attempts at ‘sharing’ that attracted no likes, and no retweets.” Another brutally descriptive name, which probably is as it should be.
Kickended: What happens to Kickstarter crowdfunding campaigns that don’t raise a single dime? Kickended happens. Walker: “It’s a useful, albeit bleak, reality check. Yes, the Internet makes magic and wondrous and unprecedented things occur. But only sometimes, and not for everyone.” The name falls short of its goal, too: Kicked to the Curb is more to the point.
Read the rest of Walker’s column for additional Sad Internet examples.
| |
|
Estivate: To spend the summer (in a special place, for example); to pass the summer in a dormant or torpid state (zoological usage). From Latin aestus, summer. Compare hibernate (to pass the winter in a dormant state).
Estivate doesn’t often find its way into everyday parlance, but I came across it in Ben Brantley’s review in the New York Times of The Country House, a new play by Donald Margulies starring Blythe Danner (aka Gwyneth Paltrow’s mother):
The setting in this case is Williamstown, Mass., home to a venerable and usually star-studded summer theater festival. Anna (like Ms. Danner, as it happens) has estivated in Williamstown for many a decade.
Coincidentally, I had also just read (that very same day, in fact) a TechCrunch report about a new business called Estify. A company capable of spreading summer throughout the year sounds like a delightful thing, but that is not Estify’s mission.
Proofreading note: Please delete the comma after “time-consuming.”
Estify does a rambling and inept job of telling its story, but the TechCrunch story makes it clear that “Estify” comes from “estimate”:
There’s a rift between insurance companies and repair shops, explains Jordan Furniss, one of Estify’s co-founders. “[Insurers] write up a preliminary estimate for what a repair should cost and then repair shops have to duplicate that estimate into their systems.”
That means Estify joins the growing list of -ify names created from verbs: Chargify, Predictify, Chirpify, Connectify, et al.). As my colleague The Name Inspector (Christopher Johnson) has pointed out:
You don’t find -ify attached to verbs in natural English, because the point of the -ify ending is to make a verb out of a different kind of word. The only exception The Name Inspector has thought of is preachify, and he’s willing to wager that’s a tongue-in-cheek word, based on the similar word speechify, that’s meant to illustrate the kind artificially puffed-up speaking style it refers to.
And while we’re on the subject, The Name Inspector and I will be co-presenting a paper on naming trends at the American Name Society’s annual meeting in Portland, Oregon, in January. I’ll focus on names that end in -ly and Chris will tackle the -ifys. (I’ll also be giving a solo presentation on the nomenclature of legal cannabis, a topic I’ve touched on in this blog.) The ANS meeting is held concurrently with meetings of the American Linguistic Association and the American Dialect Society; an annual highlight is the word-of-the-year vote, which is open to the public. If you live in Portland or plan to be there between January 8 and 11, I’d love to meet up!
| |
|
A mysterious blogger whom I know only as The Least Shrew—her Twitter bio identifies her as Kaylin in Akron, Ohio—has done me the great honor of turning a peculiar research project of mine into a flowchart that she calls “How to Name Your Website.”
“Is your brand cutesy? Hardcore? Buddhist? None of the above?” View and embiggen the full chart.
That’s right: she studied my Pinterest boards of naming trends—Names That End in -ly, Brand Names with Gratuitous Umlauts, and all the rest—and applied linear logic to them.
Of course, for strict accuracy, the label should be “How to Name Your Company or Product”—this is a lot bigger than websites. And until I told her about The Name Inspector’s Wall of Namifying—the project that inspired my own collections—The Least Shrew hadn’t been aware of it, so all those -ify names—Rockify, Subsify, Wingify, et al.—don’t get proper representation.
But those quibbles aside, it’s a brilliant infographic. I’m deeply flattered.
| |
|
My new guest post at Duets Blog, “Trendifying Adverbially: When Naming Fads Become Epidemics,” takes a serious look at copycat naming. Why are there at least 193 195 companies or products whose names end in -ly? What explains the surge in names that end in -ify? Is lack of awareness to blame, or the opposite—an eagerness to hitch one’s star to a branding bandwagon?
Read the post—and leave a comment with your own observations, if you like.
| |
|
“The Man Who Has Stolen the Straw” (Armenian), “Way of the Birds” (Estonian), and other cultures’ names for what we call the Milky Way. In Sanskrit, the galaxy is called “Mandakini,” which translates to “calm” or “unhurried,” but could also be the name of the latest swimwear sensation. (Via @mashedradish.)
*
“The Internet is a James Joyce novel”: on the playful language of image macros.
Image macro via The American Scholar.
*
Love it or loathe it, “impactful” didn’t originate in business jargon or advertising copy. And, as Language Log’s Mark Liberman discovered, its use is decades older than you think.
*
Saturated golden-yellow means “big independent film,” and 14 other movie-poster clichés.
*
Alpha-stacking—pushing movie titles to the front of the alphabet—is becoming more common. One independent-studio head says it’s because “Americans are lazy people. They can’t be bothered to go past ‘L’.”
*
The director Lee Daniels can’t catch a break with his movie titles.
*
The baby formally known as Prince: Ben Yagoda on the naming customs of the rich and royal. (Plus: “delivered of a son” and “mommy tummy.”)
*
“Is there anything preventing a company from calling its active ingredient supercurol? Well, yes.” James Harbeck on how prescription drugs get their names.
*
Did Spotify start the namifying trend? The Name Inspector provides infographic evidence. (See his Pinterest Wall of Namifying, too.)
*
“That’s a good idea,” “It’s gonna be awesome,” “We should talk,” and other banal phrases that American businesses have trademarked.
*
The most popular ad campaign in Japan—it’s been running for six years—features “the White family”: mother, daughter, father (a human in a dog’s body), son (a black American), and maid (an alien incarnation of Tommy Lee Jones). Quentin Tarantino and a Japanese astronaut have made cameo appearances. The ads are for SoftBank, a mobile provider; there are no subtitles, but the surrealism transcends the language barrier. Watch a bunch of the ads here.
*
People have been literally exploding over non-literal literally. The Visual Thesaurus rounds up the online reactions to the controversy, including this one from the Oxford English Dictionary’s Fiona McPherson: “We literally cannot see what all the fuss is about.”
And that’s it for this month. Literally.
| |
|
Spotted at Bed Bath & Beyond: a new -ify coinage.
I believe this design template is called Everything But the Unicorn.
The product’s name is Slushy Magic – the package contains “magic cubes” (filled with saline solution or gel, possibly) and a “Slushy Magic Cup” – but the stated benefit is slushification. Can you slushify your Zenify? Why, yes, you can!
But wait, the suffixifying fun has just started! As the Slushy Magic product video says, “It’s slush-a-licious!”
If you think that’s over-the-top, read this loopy Amazon review:
Upon discovering this vast beauty located in a not-so-local WalGreens, my happiness meter jumped from “Oh gawd, I need tampons” to “HULLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO SLUSHIES” (no I did not forget my lady things, I just happened to possibly mistakenly pick up cotton balls and twine). Of course, being the impatient person I am, I immediately ripped open that beautiful cyan blue box, with the happy children on the front, their precious cherub faces, gleaming at me with their cheery smiles as if to say, “Come to my slushy fountain, drink upon the abrosia [sic] of the Gods!”. In my exuberance, I did happen to endure the brutal, stabbing wound of a papercut, and some may or may not have gotten on the cup. It is alright, we all need more iron in our diets. Joyfully, I threw the saline-filled-whatevers into the freezer in wait for my delicious slushy shakin’ morning!
Take it from me: She’s just getting warmed up.
Somewhat related: Robert Lane Greene on the nounification of adjectives.
Bonus vocabulary fun: The OED says slush (“partially melted snow or ice; soft mud; food of a watery consistency; rubbishy discourse or literature”) is of “doubtful” origin. Slush fund (“a fund used to buy luxuries or to bribe”) originated in the 1830s in the U.S. Navy. The drink known as slushy goes by many other names, including Hawaiian ice, shave(d) ice, snow cone, and snowball. And that’s just in the U.S.; see this Wikipedia entry for slushy synonyms around the world.
| |
|
