« Word of the Week: Behindativeness | Main | Names in the Wild: Qookies »

February 26, 2013

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

"Just add good" seems like a pretty counterproductive slogan. It's not in there to start with? I've got to add it? I'm going to look for something that already has the good in it.

David C: I think the yogurt is supposed to be the "good" that's added to the main dish. As the awkwardly phrased copy in the first screengrab says: "Simply substitute conventional ingredients with our rich, creamy Greek yogurt."

Better still, substitute good writing for bad.

I had the same reaction as David. "Just add ..." is a known formula. "Instant ___: just add water." In my opinion, that's a bad strike against this bit of writing, worse than the charge of tedious trendy nounification.

As for "substitute ___ with" where I would expect "substitute ___ for", well, it startles me every time I see it, but I think it may be perfectly normal for many speakers/writers of English. I seem to remember that it was discussed at LanguageHat a few years ago. (I'm not saying anyone has to like it. I don't like it myself.)

Empty: Well, maybe that's why Chobani has abandoned "good" and taken a shine to "real."

Am I right that, whereas Diamond Nuts owns Emerald Nuts, there is no connection with Blue Diamond Almonds?

I loved the acrostic E-M-E-R-A-L-D-N-U-T-S campaign of a few years back. There will never be a better ad for a nut.

will there be added comppund noun REAL GOOD soon?

Maybe an organic desserts place could claim it's Realing the Good.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

My Web Site

Top 25 Language Language Professional Blogs 2014
Top 25 Language Professionals Blogs 2012
Top 25 Language Professionals Blogs 2011
Top 10 Language Professionals Blogs 2010
Top 100 Language Blogs 2009

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Bookmark and Share

Categories

Top 25 Language Language Professional Blogs 2014