This is the sort of thing that gives branding a bad name.
Remember the new Pepsi logo I wrote about last month? Fast Company now shares a leaked 27-page design brief (PDF) that explains the thinking, if you can call it that, behind the logo change. I can't put it any more succinctly than FC does: "It may be one of the most ridiculous things ever perpetrated by somebody calling himself a designer."
The magazine continues:
It gets worse. The brief is full of misspellings ("ration" for "ratio"; "aesteticism" for "aestheticism"), poor grammar ("Magnetic field are impacted by sun radiation and wind motion"), and bafflegab:
"The Pepsi DNA finds its origin in the dynamic of perimeter oscillations."
"Emotive forces shape the gestalt of the brand identity."
"A sphere is defined as the surface formed by rotating a circle around any diameter."
"Establishment of a gravitational pull to shift from a 'transactional' experience to an 'invitational' expression."
And then there's this, which is just boggling:
And yet ... not a word about the Obama campaign logo that the Pepsi design so obviously resembles (or rips off).
I thought Arnell Group sounded familiar. Turns out I'd written about them a year and a half ago. Apparently their jargon generator is still humming away. All too successfully, I regret to report.
UPDATE: Steven Heller critiques Arnell's redesign of the Tropicana package: "Give me a sun-soaked orange over a Crate and Barrel juice glass anytime."


One is struck speechless.
Posted by: Jon Carroll | February 10, 2009 at 04:08 PM
What's really great is that the Arnell home page still has the same crap it had 18 months ago when you looked at it, complete with "Please excuse us while our website is under construction." Who would hire them?!? Besides Pepsi, I mean. I guess if you're looking for someone to "execute across every consumer and trade touchpoint," Arnell's the group to go with.
Posted by: Amy Reynaldo | February 10, 2009 at 04:42 PM
after a year-and-a-half the group's web-page is still under construction. they must be distracted... by the gravitational pull of their intense sucking.
Posted by: michael | February 10, 2009 at 05:17 PM
Ye gads. Please don't tell me what Arnell was paid for this tosh fest.
Posted by: Tracey Taylor | February 10, 2009 at 06:19 PM
@Tracey: "Pepsi would not discuss what it's paying for the revamp, but experts estimate the cost for a top firm to work five months at north of $1 million." - Advertising Age, Oct. 27, 2008.
http://adage.com/article?article_id=132016
Posted by: Nancy Friedman | February 10, 2009 at 08:21 PM
"... north of $1 million." We would have done it for half that. :)
I wonder if Arnell tracked how much of that budget went into actually designing the logo versus how much was spent on the presentation to sell it.
Posted by: Devon Thomas Treadwell | February 10, 2009 at 10:12 PM
Peter Arnell is evidently one of Martha Stewart's BFFs, since he has appeared on her TV show many times, displaying his various collections. He reminds me of the character "Sanjay" from the CBC series "Slings and Arrows" (Sundance Channel), and this latest effort only reinforces that image.
Posted by: evvance | February 11, 2009 at 08:25 AM
Thanks, Nancy, for this post. My jaw hasn't dropped this far this fast in a while.
Posted by: Carolyn McMaster | February 11, 2009 at 03:09 PM
Pepsi logo looks like store brand now.
Posted by: linda | March 14, 2009 at 10:44 PM
I thought Korean Airlines had merged with Pepsi and Pepsi adopted the KAL logo.
Posted by: Sam from Seattle | April 22, 2009 at 09:36 AM