Was anyone else bothered by this passage in Tom (no relation) Friedman's op-ed column in yesterday's New York Times? The dateline was Beijing; the headline was "Melting Pot Meets Great Wall." Here's what I'm talking about:
Walking through the Olympic Village the other day, here’s what struck me most: the Russian team all looks Russian; the African team all looks African; the Chinese team all looks Chinese; and the American team looks like all of them.
Say what?
Let's leave aside the probability that a Moscow native would probably find plenty of diversity in the facial features, stature, and skin colors of his compatriots. Likewise a native of Beijing. What really bugs me is the reference to "the African team"—as though there were only one.
Last time I checked, Africa was a continent (the world's second largest), with 53 countries and seven dependencies. Most of those countries sent teams to the Olympic Games. And in no way were the members of those teams homogeneous in appearance, language, politics, or culture. To cite just some of the most obvious examples: Ous Meloulli of Tunisia, who snatched a breathtaking win in the 1600-meter freestyle from the favorite, Australia's Grant Hackett, could pass for Syrian or Palestinian; he looks nothing at all like blonde swimmer Kirsty Coventry, who won all of Zimbabwe's medals. And neither of them resembles Togo's first-ever Olympic medalist, the kayaker Benjamin Boukpeti, or men's marathon winner Samuel Wanjiru of Kenya.
Even if Tom Friedman had intended to write "African teams," his statement is ridiculous—and embarrassing for a writer who has built his reputation on globalism (see The World Is Flat).
Unfortunately, Friedman is far from the only American with a huge blind spot about everything south of Gibraltar. During the opening ceremonies of this year's Olympic Games, NBC's Matt Lauer (or was it Bob Costas?) seemed bemused when the small contingent from Central African Republic entered the stadium. "Well, as I said four years ago," Lauer/Costas said with a chuckle, "I can tell you that Central African Republic is a republic. In central Africa."
Time to get a clue, media people. Right now a guy named Obama is about to accept his party's nomination for president of the United States. His father was from Kenya. That's a country. In Africa.
I would have figured out your objections eventually, but the first thing that struck me was the dangling modifier: "Walking through the Olympic Village the other day, here’s what struck me most." Not a terrible dangler, as danglers go, but my syntax antennae were more sensitive than my stereotypingstupidity antennae. (Occupational hazard, I suppose.)
Posted by: Jan Freeman | August 25, 2008 at 07:00 PM
Hey, where did my hyphen go? "Stereotyping hyphen stupidity," please.
Posted by: Jan Freeman | August 25, 2008 at 07:01 PM
@Jan: I gritted my teeth over that misplaced modifier, too. There seem to be a lot of them (and other grammatical errors) in the Times these days.
Posted by: Nancy Friedman | August 25, 2008 at 07:37 PM
Oh, wow. Well said (about the dangling modifier as well). I just read an article on how newsroom maps often display Greenland as larger than Africa when it's really not. It's an enormous continent, with a lot going on there -- and people need to pay attention!
Posted by: TadMack | August 26, 2008 at 04:58 AM
If you start gnashing your teeth about Tom "Air Miles" Friedman, you'll need dentures in the near future.
To be fair to Bob Costas, however, he made the point of saying that he introduces the CAR that way in each Olympics since he did it in 1992 and received a torrent of angry emails. It was a self-aware joke highlighting American ignorance about other countries.
By the way, I once asked someone in a job interview if they could name all the countries bordering the Central African Republic. He passed with flying colors (we were a very globally oriented group).
Posted by: Lance Knobel | August 26, 2008 at 01:27 PM