What it is: a new website for women over 40. Content includes articles about health, fashion, love, marriage, and politics, as well as "intimate" celebrity interviews. And, naturally, a horoscope.
Who's behind it: five "media live-wire" femmes d'un certain age, according to an article in the Thursday Styles section of the New York Times--former book publisher Joni Evans, veteran gossip columnist Liz Smith, advertising executive Mary Wells, political columnist Peggy Noonan, and TV news reporter Lesley Stahl.
Media live-wires they may be, but cyber-savvy they are wo-wo-woefully not, according to reporter Stephanie Rosenbloom:
Web culture, from the technicalities of uploading content to the verbal nakedness that is blogging, was unfamiliar. Even acquiring a domain name was, as Ms. Smith put it at a gathering of some of the founders the other day, an uphill battle.
“I wanted to call the site AllTheGoodNamesAreTaken.com,” she said. (Actually, she wanted to call it Hot Voodoo, after the Marlene Dietrich song, but the other women shot it down.)
Ms. Stahl suggested adopting a name that incorporated the word “broad,” like broad-minded, but there were objections to that too.
“I went through a period where I really thought ‘After all we have done in our lives and accomplished — to call ourselves broads?’ ” said Ms. Wells, the founder of the advertising and marketing agency Wells Rich Greene.
Somewhere Ms. Evans has a long list of thumbs-down domain names (i.e., HerTube.com). “I remember how innocent we were,” she said. The name they settled on is a play on “Women on the Web.”
“We actually bought out a porn site to get this name,” Ms. Evans said. (Technically, they didn’t buy a porn business, just womenontheweb.com.) Now, “when anyone looks for that porn site, they’re directed to us,” said Ms. Evans, who became chief executive of the site after retiring last year as a senior vice president at the William Morris Agency’s literary department.
One is all for sisters doing it, you know, for themselves, but still. One despairs. One inquires:
-
Did it not occur to these ladies even once to seek the levelheaded counsel of someone with professional naming and domain-acquisition experience? Someone who could, say, mediate the discussion and provide a much-needed reality check?
-
Did anyone consider that the name might be confusing to read and say? (I thought it was pronounced woe-woe-wow until I saw the logo, which looks like Wow O Wow.)
-
Did anyone perform the simple experiment of saying the name aloud? (Consider the poor receptionist, saying "wowowow" 150 times a day.)
-
Did anyone ask, "How does 'Wowowow' advance our brand story? How does it express maturity, media savvy, a different voice? How on earth does it say 'Women on the Web'?"
-
Did anyone raise her hand and say, "Wowowow: this just sounds silly"?
-
About that porn-site redirect: did anyone ask herself and her colleagues, "Could this be a liability?"
And one more thing: a horoscope? Oh. Woe.
The site launches Saturday.




Wow? Ow, Ow.
Posted by: Orange | March 06, 2008 at 08:27 AM
And also Whoa.
Posted by: Nancy Friedman | March 06, 2008 at 08:51 AM
I couldn't agree with you more. Why did such patently smart women make such a hash of this and then voluntarily expose how naive they were to the NYT? (Why the NYT should profile them before the site is even launched is another question.)Your expertise would have been invaluable. BTW I love your blog, but for what it's worth, I much preferred its original title.
Posted by: Tracey Taylor | March 06, 2008 at 02:21 PM
I for one HATE the lumping together of "women over 40" and "young women" over in another category. At 41, this group of women and their site doesn't speak to me at all. But I also cannot stand MySpace.
I do, however like your blog very much.
Posted by: Tay | March 06, 2008 at 03:08 PM
Hot Voodoo would've been a damn sight better than this hot mess. Just appalling how much the technological ignorance and marketing tone-deafness shines through.
Posted by: Jessica | March 07, 2008 at 02:09 PM
For women over 40? Perhaps they should have gone with "Double-Venti" or "Venus Venti", except nobody would love that either. It would be very vigesimal, though (and I think my wife would prefer counting her age in base 20 rather than base 10).
I've got it - they could have called it "The Vigesimal Monologs"!
If you'll excuse me, I have to get over to GoDaddy right away...
Posted by: Night Writer | March 13, 2008 at 10:24 AM
They should've called it "BoToxIn'"
Check out this page...
http://www.wowowow.com/women
Posted by: Edwina Trout | March 13, 2008 at 11:40 AM
Okay. One more and that's it, I swear.
WWWOW
"White Women and Whoopi on the Web"
Posted by: Edwina Trout | March 13, 2008 at 12:06 PM
Night Writer: Fabulous. The Vigesimal Va-jay-jay--hear her roar!
Edwina Trout: Yikes! That line-up looks downright marmoreal. Marlo Thomas is 70, for Jeebus' sake! She's practically That Dowager! Time to respect the law of gravity, I say.
Posted by: Nancy Friedman | March 13, 2008 at 12:11 PM
I've heard the URL pronounced as "wow, wow, wow," which is not a bad impression to give of your site--but not an accurate spelling of the URL, either!
Makes me think of the way the naming of Slashdot backfired on its creators. Of course, that site went on to become a huge success in spite of its awkward-to-say URL. I'm not sure Wowowow.com will be as lucky. I'm 40 myself, and can't see much appeal in it.
Posted by: Sallie Goetsch (rhymes with | March 14, 2008 at 05:48 PM