« The Lick Fire | Main | Word of the Week: Variorum »

September 07, 2007


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I think one problem was, the production manager had majored in film studies -- in other words, had not spent a lot of time thinking about texts. So she assigned to the CMOS a prescriptivist force which the CMOS does not claim for itself. If you actually read the CMOS, it's rather like the Talmud: it doesn't simply offer rules, it offers ways of working out a good decision. But someone who is nervous about the whole idea of working something out, who really just wants a hard-and-fast rule, will feel safest falling back on the simplest version of what the CMOS might be taken to say. Because they think following hard-and-fast rules is an end in itself, the very activity of working out a decision looks suspect -- this is not the way they use the CMOS, and anyone who does (they feel) is likely to do something disgraceful.

Helen: Thanks for visiting and commenting! I love your comparison of CMOS to the Talmud. And a production manager in book publishing who majored in film studies? Oy.

Helen DeWitt's reasoning makes great sense to me.

And now that I have read her comment to your post, I'm with you. The CMOS and the Talmud is a fitting comparison.

Keep creating...infinite games,

The comments to this entry are closed.


  • Pinterest
    Follow Me on Pinterest
My Photo

My Web Site

Top 25 Language Language Professional Blogs 2014
Top 25 Language Professionals Blogs 2012
Top 25 Language Professionals Blogs 2011
Top 10 Language Professionals Blogs 2010
Top 100 Language Blogs 2009

Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz

Bookmark and Share


Top 25 Language Language Professional Blogs 2014